I haven't blogged about man-made global warming climate change in a while. So much other stuff going on!
Lately we have an international oil pipeline that can deliver energy to millions of and jobs to thousands. Yet, the radical environmentalist left, including President Hope&Change, is blocking it. Why? The hoax of mmgwcc, that's why.
Meanwhile, not covered by the DBF* media of course is the fact that scientists are jumping off the mmgwcc bandwagon more and more. In Britain, in continental Europe, and in the U.S.
Karin McQuillan summarizes these developments in this AT piece:
Media coverage on global warming has been criminally one-sided. The public doesn't know where the global warming theory came from in the first place. Answer: the U.N., not a scientific body. The threat of catastrophic warming was launched by the U.N. to promote international climate treaties that would transfer wealth from rich countries to developing countries. It waspolitical from the beginning, with the conclusion assumed: the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (U.N. IPCC) was funded to report on how man was changing climate. Its scientific reports have been repeatedly corrected for misrepresentation and outright fraud.
This is important. Global warming theory did not come from a breakthrough in scientific research that enabled us to understand our climate. We still don't understand global climate any more than we understand the human brain or how to cure cancer. The science of global climate is in its infancy. ...
There is a lot of emotion and little common sense in this argument. If a diagnosis is based on a shaky and partly fraudulent theory, ignores much more convincing evidence, and has terrible negative side effects, you don't perform major surgery. We do not have to run around like Chicken Little on the off-chance that the sky may be falling.
There has been a high economic cost to limiting our oil and gas wealth, with much human anguish because of government-imposed economic contraction. Responsible government policy requires honest media coverage, unfettered scientific inquiry, and robust political debate. Our country cannot afford the costs of foolish energy policy based on politicized science and fear.
She's correct. That's all this has been: politicized science and fear. A hoax on which basis the environ-mental-ist left can control our energy, control our prosperity, control our lives.
Recent Comments